Enviro Mentalist Anti-Sex League Pushing Human Depopulation Agenda
- 1984
- abortion
- apologists
- Big Brother
- china
- culled
- Eugenics
- family planning
- genetically unfit parents
- Intellectual Osmosis
- malthusian
- mexico
- Ministry of Love
- Ministry of Plenty
- Ministry of Truth
- Newsday
- one-child policy
- Our Government At Work
- Peru
- RU486
- sustainable development
- TheProles
- UNCF
- UNFPA
- United Nations
- World News
In its preamble, the recently unveiled UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities recognizes "the inherent dignity and worth and equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world."
A recent Newsday article comments on the, "80th anniversary of the disgraceful Supreme Court decision in Buck v. Bell." They assert that the U.S. and the U.N. are staunch advocates for human rights and the rights of "genetically unfit" parents not to be sterilized. Popular malignant eugenics apologists support the notion that children with genetic impairments should be extinguished.
No government, Malthusian doctor or non-governmental organization owns our children. We do. A child is should never be state-owned. The parents have the responsibility of raising children and doing as they see fit as long as they do not harm the child. We have all heard the overpopulation horror stories and their solution is the final solution. In the Newsday article, the United Nations is trumpeted as the savior of humanity. Yet, if they had their way, there would be a strictly enforced "one-child policy" and abortions would be managed like a McDonald's restaurant, "one-billion culled".
"Every child is our child." - Motto of the United Nations Children's Fund
The United Nations is the primary organization promoting this overpopulation agenda, and one of their solutions is the RU486 drug for chemical abortions. In the their own document "World Population Monitoring 2002" they support the use of this drug in their 'family planning' program:
"Since 1990, 29 countries have modified their laws or regulations concerning abortion (table 33):8 developed countries, 15 developing countries and 6 countries with economies in transition. In addition, health authorities have approved use of Mifepristone (RU-486) for pregnancy termination in 18 countries, while clinical trials have been authorized in another 6 countries (table 34)."
Also, in their family planning program they support "forced abortions" as they consider China the model for the rest of the world. According to wikipedia:
"In 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005, the White House denied funding to UNFPA that had already been allocated by the U.S. Congress on the grounds that the UNFPA supported Chinese government programs which include forced abortions and sterilizations. In a letter from the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns to Congress, the administration said it had determined that UNFPA’s support for China’s population programme 'facilitates (its) government’s coercive abortion programme', thus violating a 20-year-old law that bans the use of United States aid to finance or support abortions overseas."
The UN and the World Health Organization both support the "Sustainable Development", an aggressive depopulation scheme which is pushed in third-world countries and on the continent of Africa. The UNFPA or United Nations Fund for Population Activities used their funding to push countries like Peru and Mexico to "hold that the population in a country should be proportional to the capacity of its territory to generate sufficient food." in turn, the government forced their doctors to sterilize their men and women. The United Nations is a shameless organization and an epic failure much like its predecessor, A League of Nations, and is far from an example of human rights that it is touted to be.
Forced abortions, sterilization, euthanasia, and all forms of eugenics are deplorable concepts. It is nauseating to find out that many of our leaders and captains of industry see us not as individuals, but herds of cattle who can be culled. In their sick minds, they trim the herd so that there will be more to eat on their tables, yet they never get their hands dirty.
Michael Vail











Bookmark this site
Bookmark this page
Make Us your homepage



